The San Antonio Spurs rolled through the regular season, won more games than any other Western Conference team. The continued success of the Spurs has meant counting them out is something that sportswriters and experts alike often condemn. This however, is not a regular San Antonio team. Gone are the days where you throw the ball to Tim Duncan and watch him dominate on the block. Gone are the days Tim has a frontcourt mate (whether it be Rasho Nesterovic, Nazr Mohammed, David Robinson, or Robert Horry) to help him lockup the paint defensively. Gone are the days where the 3point shot was a compliment to a dominant inside game for the Spurs. And, gone are the days where lockdown defence was the staple of the organisation. While regular season success has not translated to the post season and many people have been left stunned, it is easy to understand why this team was never geared for a deep playoff run. Anybody that watched the Spurs play this season saw a distinct change in playing style from what we have become accustomed to. Change that may have helped them coast through the regular season but would inevitably harm them in the postseason. After much analysis and time spent thinking about what changed for the Spurs that has seen them recently fade in the postseason, three distinct points of difference emerged.
Heavy Reliance on the 3point Shot.
Regular season success for the Spurs strongly hindered on if the 3point shot was falling for them. While being a decent 3point shooting team is an important aspect for any Playoff team, there is a difference between relying on it and using it to compliment the offense. During the regular season the Spurs shot 42.2% from 3 in wins and only 32.9% in losses, this may be an obvious statistic to some as you assume if you shoot well you will win. But, when you crunch the numbers further, the Spurs heavy reliance on the 3 is revealed. That differential of 9.3% between wins and losses is the second highest amongst Playoff teams, trailing only the Knicks (9.8% differential). To provide a benchmark, the average differential between 3point percentages in wins when compared to losses amongst Playoff teams is 6.5%. Making 3s is a great compliment to any good offensive team but should not be something that is relied upon night and night out to give your team a chance to win against good teams as it is with this Spurs team. All too often we have seen jump-shooting teams experience regular season success only to falter in the Playoffs, this list includes teams such as Phoenix, Orlando and Dallas.
Lack of Size and Interior Presence.
Being able to lockdown the paint in the Playoffs and challenge shots at the rim is something very important to Playoff teams. Tim is no longer someone that can be paired with any PF or C and can be expected to carry them. Players such as Rasho, Nazr and Fab no longer suffice next to a 35-year old Tim Duncan. Tim needs a backcourt partner that can assist in shouldering the defensive load and provide some form of interior scoring on the offensive end. The Spurs have been exposed in the first round going up against the duo of Zach Randolph and Marc Gasol. Despite all the media attention and hype given to Zach Randolph, often ZBo hasn’t been the problem - Marc has simply outplayed Tim. We have seen too many instances where Tim looks to secure a defensive rebound, only to have it ripped away by a bigger, stronger and younger, Marc. Tiago Splitter may become the frontcourt mate so desperately needed, but it is help that has come too late. Tim is currently the Spurs only form of rim defence; no other player will make you think twice about challenging them. Matt Bonner (too slow) and DeJuan Blair (too small) can be extreme defensive liabilities at times depending on the matchup, while Antonio McDyess should be getting spot minutes and not depended upon to guard star players such as Dirk, ZBo and Pau Gasol for 30 minutes.
Absence of Length and Size on the Perimeter.
Granted depth is less of a factor in the Playoffs when the best five to six players on the team will combine for over 80% of the available minutes, the players that surround your core guys should at least be capable defensively. A good example of this is the Chicago Bulls, while their roster on paper is not all too impressive, they surrounded their core players with length, defence and toughness with players such as Ronnie Brewer, CJ Watson, Keith Bogans and Luol Deng. While I am not suggesting that another Keith Bogans appearance is the solution, the Bulls were able to incorporate the players listed above along with their core players to achieve the best defence and overall record in the NBA. Before you shout at your screens that Playoff success is the topic of conversation and the Bulls are yet to prove anything in the postseason. The Spurs relying on 3point shooting is a trait by which success in the Playoffs cannot be relied upon, while lockdown defence is usually a key focus of any successful Playoff team. Manu Ginobili is currently the Spurs best answer defensively for players such as Dwyane Wade and Kobe Bryant, and while he generally does a great job, it would be nice for the Spurs to not completely rely on Manu offensively, as well as defensively to guard elite perimeter players.
An interesting side note to this is that the Spurs ranked 11th in Defensive Efficiency this season while Chicago ranked 1st. For those that don’t know, Defensive Efficiency is the amount of points a team allowed per 100 possessions, it is better to look at this then points allowed as it factors in pace. (I recently commented on an article on the Bleacher Report and cited Defensive Efficiency, when the author replied it was obvious he had no idea what it actually was and thus I felt the need to explain… okay now I’m rambling.)
There are many obvious problems with the Spurs that prevent them from going far in the Playoffs. The Spurs have run into a team that not only exploit all of their weaknesses, but punish them for it. Even if changes are made to rectify the problems mentioned, it might be too late for the Spurs. Tim Duncan turned 35 a couple of days ago, while Manu and Tony will turn 34 and 29 respectively before next season. Sure, the Spurs will bounce back and win another 50 games next season. But, being a small market team with no room to move financially, very little trade assets and an aging core does not bode well for the four time champs. It may finally be time to count them out.





